Litigator / Practicing Attorney
micro1
Verified listingOverview
micro1 is engaging practicing attorneys to contribute expertise to a customer project focused on the intersection of law and emerging technology. In this role, you'll apply litigation and legal reasoning expertise to evaluate, refine, and enhance AI-generated legal content like briefs, arguments, and memos.
What You’ll Do
- Apply legal reasoning and litigation experience to evaluate, refine, and enhance AI-generated legal content such as briefs, arguments, and memos
- Review and assess AI outputs for factual and legal accuracy, analytical rigor, and adherence to professional standards
- Provide detailed, written feedback identifying errors, logical inconsistencies, and areas for improvement in legal responses
- Contribute expert judgment on ambiguous or complex edge cases, informing model calibration for nuanced legal issues
- Draft or edit sample legal language and arguments to strengthen model understanding of varied litigation and practice scenarios
- Collaborate asynchronously with a cross-functional project team, incorporating iterative feedback and delivering clear written communication
Requirements
- JD degree from an ABA-accredited U.S. law school
- Active license in good standing in at least one U.S. jurisdiction
- 3–15 years of post-JD legal experience
- Strong preference for trial, appellate, or litigation specialists
- Judicial clerkship experience at federal or state level (trial or appellate courts) highly valued
- Proven expertise in legal writing
- Demonstrated ability to communicate complex legal concepts with clarity, precision, and professionalism
Who Should Apply
This suits attorneys with solid litigation chops who want flexible, asynchronous work without the billable hour grind—and who find the prospect of training AI systems intellectually engaging. It frustrates people who need steady income, benefits, or mentorship from senior partners, or who expect to work on their own substantive cases rather than evaluate others' work.
Salary Insight
The $100–$180/hr range signals mid-to-senior contract work for practicing attorneys; the width reflects both experience level (3–15 years spans a broad spectrum) and geography. This is contract work rather than W-2, so you should factor in self-employment tax and lack of benefits when evaluating the effective rate. Judicial clerks and specialists with trial or appellate experience would typically land toward the higher end.
About Micro1
Platform connecting domain experts with AI training and evaluation projects, paid on a flexible contract basis.
Remote policy: Remote worldwide, excluding Afghanistan, Belarus, China, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Hong Kong, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Macao, Myanmar, North Korea, Russia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Ukraine and Yemen. Individual projects may have…
How hiring works at Micro1 →Required Skills
Compensation
$100 - $180/hr
- Location
- USA only
- Engagement
- Contract
- Posted
- Oct 4
Opens micro1’s listing on MyRemoteJobs — we don’t collect applications ourselves.
About Micro1
Platform connecting domain experts with AI training and evaluation projects, paid on a flexible contract basis.
Remote policy: Remote worldwide, excluding Afghanistan, Belarus, China, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Hong Kong, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Macao, Myanmar, North Korea, Russia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Ukraine and Yemen. Individual projects may have…
How hiring works at Micro1 →Will your CV get past the filter?
Most applications are rejected by software before a person ever reads them. Scan your CV using our ATS Checker tool, see exactly what's blocking it, then fix it in the CV Builder and apply knowing it'll get through.
Scan my CVGet roles like this by email
Tell us what you do and we'll email you when a similar remote job is posted. No account needed.
See our jobs more often in your search
Add MyRemoteJobs as a Preferred Source on Google. Free, takes seconds, and you stay on this page.
Application Tip
Lead with a specific example of a brief, memo, or complex legal argument you've written or edited that you're proud of—ideally one where you caught a subtle analytical flaw or navigated genuine ambiguity in the law. This team is evaluating AI legal output, so they're hiring for judgment and the ability to articulate *why* something is wrong, not just that it is. A sample of your written feedback or editing work will carry more weight than credentials alone.
Sourced from MyRemoteJobs · verified against the original posting